Research and Method
Public-source writing on how investors, regulators, and counterparties interpret a company at consequential cross-border moments.
Narrative Power Analysis (NPA) organizes its reading of a company in five layers: power relations, interpretation control, obstacle discrimination, supporting infrastructure, and intervention logic.
2 published
Question. How do classification and interpretation affect valuation and market placement when a company crosses jurisdictions?
Scope. Cross-border financing and listing decisions, including the categories, comparisons and evidence used to place a company.
See programme work3 published
Question. How do ownership, control and institutional expectations shape whether a company or transaction is considered acceptable?
Scope. Cross-border acquisitions and market entry, including regulatory acceptability, institutional access and the reading of control.
See programme workEvidence. Public filings, official statements, transaction documents and reported coverage, with documented evidence separated from analytical interpretation.
Outputs. Problem guides and scenario analyses are available now. Source-based studies and research notes enter the library only after publication review.
Revision. An item is updated when source material or the interpretation changes materially. Published and updated dates remain visible on the article.
Read the full sourcing and evidence boundary in Research Methods.
In preparation
A planned series for observing recurring interpretation frictions in the public record. It will enter the archive only when a source-reviewed study is published.
Search across the published method and research library.
Showing 5 of 5 published pieces.
No published work matches this combination. Clear a filter to continue browsing.
Liquidity, disclosure, and governance explain most valuation gaps. This looks at what remains after all three are addressed and the discount still does not move.
Some cross-border listings price poorly not because the equity story is weak, but because the receiving market has no settled category in which to place the issuer.
Banks slow, sellers hedge, and advisers narrow their scope before any authority opens a file. On why that early friction is not always a compliance problem.
Expansion can stall while demand holds: a permit sits, a partner goes quiet, a trade body describes the company in terms it would not use. On the other judgment in play.
Screening authorities, boards, employees and politicians read one acquisition differently. What they ask about the buyer is not what the terms answer.
The Research RSS feed contains only work that is publicly available in this library.